Ocular Response Analyzer versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurements
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2006Vol. 47(10), pp. 4410–4410
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2006 papers
J.M. Martínez-de-la-Casa, Julian Garcia-Feijoo, Ana Fernández-Vidal, Carmen Méndez-Hernández, J. García–Sánchez
Abstract
The ORA significantly overestimates IOP compared with the GAT. Differences between both sets of measures increase as the GAT-determined IOP increases. ORA readings seem to be affected by central corneal thickness.
Related Papers
- → Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters(2015)42 cited
- → The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer(2018)38 cited
- → The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature Radius on The Intraocular Pressure as Measured By Different Tonometers: Noncontact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers(2008)56 cited
- [Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure].(2010)
- → Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery(2018)1 cited