Expression ofAPITD1Is Not Related to Copy Number Changes of Chromosomal Region 1p36 or the Prognosis of Uveal Melanoma
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2007Vol. 48(11), pp. 4919–4919
Citations Over TimeTop 22% of 2007 papers
Walter van Gils, Hanneke W. Mensink, Emine Kılıç, Jolanda Vaarwater, Michaël Verbiest, Dion Paridaens, Gregorius P. M. Luyten, Annelies de Klein, Hennie T. Bru ̈ggenwirth
Abstract
These results indicate that APITD1 is not the tumor suppressor gene on 1p36 responsible for the negative prognostic effect in uveal melanoma with concurrent loss of chromosome arm 1p, region 36, and chromosome 3.
Related Papers
- → Copy-Number Variation: The Balance between Gene Dosage and Expression in Drosophila melanogaster(2011)100 cited
- → Dosage Sensitivity Shapes the Evolution of Copy-Number Varied Regions(2010)96 cited
- → Noncoding copy-number variations are associated with congenital limb malformation(2017)53 cited
- A versatile method for gene dosage quantification: multiplex PCR and single base extension for copy number and gene-conversion identification of SMN genes.(2018)
- → GATA2 deficiency associated with copy number variation: A reference for considering inborn errors of immunity(2022)