Macular Thickness Measurements in Healthy Eyes Using Six Different Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2009 papers
Abstract
Twenty healthy subjects were included in the study. Compared with the Stratus OCT all spectral OCT instruments showed significantly higher CRTs. The Spectralis HRA+OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT showed similar CRT values but significantly higher values than did all other instruments. The coefficients of variation for repeated measurements was 3.33% for the Stratus OCT, 0.46% for the Spectralis HRA+OCT, 3.09% for the Cirrus HD-OCT, 2.23% for the OCT/SLO, 2.77% for the RTVue-100 OCT, and for the SOCT 3.5%, respectively. discussion. The six OCT systems provided different results for CRT. The measurements with the Stratus OCT showed the lowest thicknesses, whereas those with the Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis HRA+OCT yielded the highest ones. These discrepancies can be explained by the differences in the retinal segmentation algorithms used by the various OCT systems. Whereas the Spectralis HRA+OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT include the RPE layer in the retinal segmentation, the other instruments do not. The data imply that the different OCT systems cannot be used interchangeably for the measurement of macular thickness.
Related Papers
- → The effect of myopia on retinal nerve fibre layer measurement: a comparative study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry(2010)72 cited
- → Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography, and Visual Field Sensitivity(2010)37 cited
- → REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF RETINAL THICKNESS AND VOLUME MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL EYES DETERMINED WITH TWO DIFFERENT CIRRUS OCT SCANNING PROTOCOLS(2010)20 cited
- → Comparing central retinal thickness in diabetic macular edema measured by two different spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices(2011)11 cited
- → Discriminating ability of Cirrus and RTVue optical coherence tomography in different stages of glaucoma(2018)5 cited