Self-Interest Bias in Moral Judgments of Others’ Actions
Citations Over TimeTop 14% of 2014 papers
Abstract
The automatic and affective nature of moral judgments leads to the expectation that these judgments are biased by an observer's own interests. Although the idea of self-interest bias is old, it has never been directly tested with respect to the moral judgments of other individuals' behaviors. The participants of three experiments observed other individuals' counternormative behavior (breaking a rule or cheating for gain), which was judged as immoral. However, this judgment became much more lenient when the observers gained from the observed behavior. All three studies showed that the influence of self-interest on moral judgments was completely mediated by the observer's increased liking for the perpetrator of the immoral acts but not by changes in mood. When the participants were induced to dislike the perpetrator (in a moderation-of-process design), the self-interest bias disappeared. Implications for the intuitionist approach to moral judgment are discussed.
Related Papers
- → Detecting, understanding, and controlling for cheating on tests(1991)65 cited
- → An Examination of Student Cheating in the Two-Year College(2003)47 cited
- → When No One Is Watching: Cheating Behavior on Projects and Assignments(1998)38 cited
- Directions and dimensions in managing cheating and plagiarism of IT students(2012)
- Cheating: Ethics in Everyday Life(2017)