On the Necessity of Distinguishing Between Unintentional and Intentional Mind Wandering
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an enormous increase in the number of studies examining mind wandering. Although participants' reports of mind wandering are often assumed to largely reflect spontaneous, unintentional thoughts, many researchers' conceptualizations of mind wandering have left open the possibility that at least some of these reports reflect deliberate, intentional thought. Critically, however, in most investigations on the topic, researchers have not separately assessed each type of mind wandering; instead, they have measured mind wandering as a unitary construct, thereby conflating intentional and unintentional types. We report the first compelling evidence that an experimental manipulation can have qualitatively different effects on intentional and unintentional types of mind wandering. This result provides clear evidence that researchers interested in understanding mind wandering need to consider the distinction between unintentional and intentional occurrences of this phenomenon.
Related Papers
- → Not all mind wandering is created equal: dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering(2014)265 cited
- → How pervasive is mind wandering, really?,(2018)129 cited
- → Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering(2016)64 cited
- → The mind that wanders: Challenges and potential benefits of mind wandering in education(2018)7 cited
- → Compliant activity inhibits deliberate mind wandering and accelerates thought probe responsiveness compared to compliant inactivity(2019)2 cited