Controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2020 papers
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common endocrinological condition which is found to be prevalent in 5-10% of women of reproductive age. Historically, a combination of anovulation and androgen excess was considered a hallmark in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Addition of ultrasound features of polycystic ovary syndrome has improved the detection of variation in the polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype. Despite the widespread use of consensus diagnostic criteria, there remain several unresolved controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Difficulty arises in methods of assessment and types of androgens to be measured to detect biochemical hyperandrogenism, setting a cut-off value for the diagnosis of clinical hyperandrogenism, setting an ultrasound threshold of antral follicle count to diagnose polycystic ovaries and also diagnosing this condition in adolescence where there is no clear definition for 'irregular cycles'. This article looks at various controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.
Related Papers
- → Interleucinas na encefalopatia hipóxico-isquêmica(2003)14 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → Genentech taps Affimed’s antibodies(2018)
- Enxerto livre de arteria epigastrica inferior: avaliacao hemodinamica e angiografica pre e pos-operatoria(1988)
- → KOMPLIKASI REGIONAL ANESTESI PADA PEDIATRIK(2023)