Transcriptional profiles discriminate bone marrow-derived and synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2005 papers

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) may be isolated from the synovial membrane by the same protocol as that used for synovial fibroblast cultivation, suggesting that MSC correspond to a subset of the adherent cell population, as MSC from the stromal compartment of the bone marrow (BM). The aims of the present study were, first, to better characterize the MSC derived from the synovial membrane and, second, to compare systematically, in parallel, the MSC-containing cell populations isolated from BM and those derived from the synovium, using quantitative assays. Fluorescent-activated cell sorting analysis revealed that both populations were negative for CD14, CD34 and CD45 expression and that both displayed equal levels of CD44, CD73, CD90 and CD105, a phenotype currently known to be characteristic of BM-MSC. Comparable with BM-MSC, such MSC-like cells isolated from the synovial membrane were shown for the first time to suppress the T-cell response in a mixed lymphocyte reaction, and to express the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity to the same extent as BM-MSC, which is a possible mediator of this suppressive activity. Using quantitative RT-PCR these data show that MSC-like cells from the synovium and BM may be induced to chondrogenic differentiation and, to a lesser extent, to osteogenic differentiation, but the osteogenic capacities of the synovium-derived MSC were significantly reduced based on the expression of the markers tested (collagen type II and aggrecan or alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, respectively). Transcription profiles, determined with the Atlas Human Cytokine/Receptor Array, revealed discrimination between the MSC-like cells from the synovial membrane and the BM-MSC by 46 of 268 genes. In particular, activin A was shown to be one major upregulated factor, highly secreted by BM-MSC. Whether this reflects a different cellular phenotype, a different amount of MSC in the synovium-derived population compared with BM-MSC adherent cell populations or the impact of a different microenvironment remains to be determined. In conclusion, although the BM-derived and synovium-derived MSC shared similar phenotypic and functional properties, both their differentiation capacities and transcriptional profiles permit one to discriminate the cell populations according to their tissue origin.

Related Papers

• → The immunosuppressive capacity of human mesenchymal stromal cells derived from amnion and bone marrow(2016)34 cited
• → Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in treatment of erectile dysfunction: Autologous or allogeneic cell sources?(2014)32 cited
• → Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: ASSESSING THE SAFETY AND TOXICITY OF VERY HIGH DOSES OF ALLOGENEIC HUMAN UMBILICAL CORD-DERIVED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS(2023)1 cited
• → Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: THE EFFECTS OF ADIPOSE TISSUE MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS (AT-MSCS) ON IMMUNOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN FEMALES WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS(2022)
• → Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: COMMENCEMENT OF FIRST-IN-HUMAN FOR CLINICAL TRIAL OF ADIPOSE TISSUE DERIVED ALLOGENEIC MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL (ADMSC) SHEETS FOR RETINAL DISEASES(2023)