Comparison of the Mapleson C circuit, 500 ml and 1.6 l self-inflating bags for delivering guideline-compliant ventilation during simulated adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Despite all the research and education that has gone into the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rates remain bleak. A significant problem has been the discrepancy between teachings and witnessed clinical practice. As a result of this, and the deleterious outcomes associated with hyperventilation, we conducted a manikin-based study to evaluate three different ventilating devices and their ability to provide guideline-compliant ventilation during simulated adult CPR.

Related Papers

• → Voluntary hyperventilation: the influence of duration and depth on the development of symptoms(1995)51 cited
• → Influence of duration of hyperventilation on rise time of PCO2, after step reduction of ventilation(1968)26 cited
• → The Time Course of Bronchoconstriction in Asthmatics during and after Isocapnic Hyperventilation(1990)40 cited
• → The electroencephalogram during hypoxia and hyperventilation(1953)31 cited
• → Can eucapnic hyperventilation prolong a subsequent breath-hold?(1987)2 cited