A systematic literature review of disability weights measurement studies: evolution of methodological choices
Archives of Public Health2022Vol. 80(1), pp. 91–91
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2022 papers
Abstract
Our review reveals that a methodological uniformity between national and GBD disability weights studies increased, especially from 2010 onwards. Over years, more studies used disease-specific health state descriptions in line with those of the GBD study, panel from general populations, and data from web-based surveys and/or household surveys. There is, however, a wide variation in valuation techniques that were used to derive disability weights at national-level and that persisted over time.
Related Papers
- → International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Framework for Change(2014)81 cited
- → A systematic process for Mining Software Repositories: Results from a systematic literature review(2021)43 cited
- → The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health(2020)20 cited
- → Exploring the Quality of Systematic Reviews on Pharmacist Interventions in Patients With Diabetes(2014)18 cited
- → Checklist(2015)