Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1983 papers

Abstract

A theory of analogy must describe how the meaning of an analogy is derived from the meanings of its parts. In the structure‐mapping theory, the interpretation rules are characterized as implicit rules for mapping knowledge about a base domain into a target domain. Two important features of the theory are (a) the rules depend only on syntactic properties of the knowledge representation, and not on the specific content of the domains; and (b) the theoretical framework allows analogies to be distinguished cleanly from literal similarity statements, applications of abstractions, and other kinds of comparisons. Two mapping principles are described: (a) Relations between objects, rather than attributes of objects, are mapped from base to target; and (b) The particular relations mapped are determined by systematicity, as defined by the existence of higher‐order relations.

Related Papers

• → Constrained Semantic Transference: A formal theory of metaphors(1986)61 cited
• → Exploiting persistent mappings in cross-domain analogical learning of physical domains(2012)11 cited
• → LEARNING FROM PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATIONS11Most of this work was completed under Prof. Don Smith at Rutgers University. Mike Pazzani, Andrea Danyluk and Bernard Silver provided valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper.(1989)15 cited
• → Incremental Refinement of Approximate Domain Theories(1991)9 cited
• → EFFECTS OF GOAL STRUCTURES' CORRESPONDENCY AND MAPPING SIMILARITY ON ANALOGICAL PROBLEM SOLVING(1992)1 cited