Improving and Expanding Estimates of the Global Burden of Disease Due to Environmental Health Risk Factors
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2019 papers
Abstract
A number of issues present challenges to the scope and accuracy of current GBD estimates for EH risk factors. For air pollution, minimal data exist on the exposure-risk relationships associated with high levels of pollution; epidemiological studies in high pollution regions should be a research priority. For lead, the GBD's current methods do not fully account for lead's impact on neurodevelopment; innovative methods to account for subclinical effects are needed. Decisions on inclusion of additional EH risk-outcome pairs need to be guided by findings of systematic reviews, the size of exposed populations, feasibility of global exposure estimates, and predicted trends in exposures and diseases. Neurotoxicants, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and climate-related factors should be high priorities for incorporation into upcoming iterations of the GBD study. Enhancing the scope and methods will improve the GBD's estimates and better guide prevention policy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5496.
Related Papers
- → Sex disparity in non-communicable disease burden in Iran from 1990 to 2021 based on the global burden of disease study(2025)2 cited
- → “Public health is global”: examining Indian stakeholders’ perspectives on Global Health education(2020)6 cited
- → Indian Public Health Students' Perspectives on Global Health Education(2021)2 cited
- Updated Estimates of Burden Due to Mental and Substance Use Disorders from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013(2015)
- National Burden of Eye Diseases in Iran 1990-2010; Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010(2014)