Confounding by Socioeconomic Status in Epidemiological Studies of Air Pollution and Health: Challenges and Opportunities
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers
Abstract
Drawing on the social epidemiology, health geography, and economic literatures, we describe how SES, a multifaceted construct operating through myriad pathways, may be conceptualized and operationalized in air pollution epidemiology studies. SES varies across individuals within the contexts of place, time, and culture. Although no single variable or index can fully capture SES, many studies rely on only a single measure. We recommend examining multiple facets of SES appropriate to the study design. Furthermore, investigators should carefully consider the multiple mechanisms by which SES might be operating to identify those SES indicators that may be most appropriate for a given context or study design and assess the impact of improper adjustment on air pollution effect estimates. Last, exploring model contraction and expansion methods may enrich adjustment, whereas statistical approaches, such as quantitative bias analysis, may be used to evaluate residual confounding. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7980.
Related Papers
- → Disentangling Race and Socioeconomic Status: A Key to Understanding Health Inequalities(2005)366 cited
- → Confounding: What It Is and What Can Be Done(2006)2 cited
- Evaluating the role of confounding in pharmacoeconomic studies.(2003)
- → Epidemiology—A Tool for Studying Environmental Influences on Children’s Health(2013)
- → The Problem of Confounding(2016)