The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up
The Bone & Joint Journal2018Vol. 100-B(8), pp. 1002–1009
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Richard Westerman, Sarah L. Whitehouse, M. J. W. Hubble, A. John Timperley, Jonathan R. Howell, Matthew Wilson
Abstract
Conclusion No stem was revised for aseptic loosening in this series. The contemporary Exeter V40 stem continues to perform well, and survival has remained comparable with that of the Exeter Universal stem. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1002-9.
Related Papers
- → Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures(2005)495 cited
- → Strikingly High Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Fractures Regardless of Surgery Timing(2023)7 cited
- → Periprosthetic Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Total Hip Fractures: Evaluation and Management(2022)4 cited
- → AAHKS Symposium(2015)