Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty
The Bone & Joint Journal2021Vol. 103-B(6), pp. 1009–1020
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2021 papers
Abstract
The learning curve of rTHA was between 12 and 35 cases, which was dependent on the assessment goal, such as operating time, accuracy, and team working. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty was associated with improved accuracy of component positioning and functional outcome, however no difference in complication rates or survival were observed at short- to mid-term follow-up. Overall, there remains an absence of high-quality level I evidence and cost analysis comparing rTHA and mTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1009-1020.
Related Papers
- → The Weibull Distribution: A New Method of Summarizing Survivorship Data(1978)317 cited
- → Patterns of survivorship in turtles (order Testudines)(1991)200 cited
- → Survivorship patterns in captive mammalian populations: implications for estimating population growth rates(2010)13 cited
- → Day Zero to Survivorship: Can Increased Monitoring throughout First Year of Transplant Impact Survivorship?(2022)