Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
The Bone & Joint Journal2022Vol. 104-B(5), pp. 541–548
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2022 papers
Junren Zhang, Nathan Ng, Chloe E. H. Scott, Mark Blyth, Fares S. Haddad, Gavin J. Macpherson, James T. Patton, Nick D. Clement
Abstract
MAKO RAUKA was associated with improved precision of component positioning but was not associated with improved PROMs using the KSS and WOMAC scores. Future longer-term studies should report functional outcomes, potentially using scores with minimal ceiling effects and survival to assess whether the improved precision of MAKO RAUKA results in better outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):541-548.
Related Papers
- → Functional improvement of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty for subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee(2023)6 cited
- → MT1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (R-UKA)* COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (T-UKA)(2019)1 cited
- → Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) to the Other Compartments(2014)
- → Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-Specific Instrumentation – Accuracy of Preoperative Planning, Time Saving and Cost Effectiveness(2018)
- → Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) After UKA to the Other Compartment(2020)