Patients’ decision making in total knee arthroplasty
Bone and Joint Research2015Vol. 4(10), pp. 163–169
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers
Abstract
This review is helpful in not only directing future research to areas that are not understood, or require confirmation, but also in highlighting areas that future interventions could address. These include those aimed at delivering information, which are likely to affect the satisfaction rate, demand, and use of knee arthroplasties. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4;163-169.
Related Papers
- → Total Joint Arthroplasty: When Do Fatal or Near-Fatal Complications Occur?(2006)99 cited
- → Letter to the Editor on “Impact of Operative Time on Adverse Events Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty”(2018)9 cited
- Focus groups: a useful tool for curriculum evaluation.(1997)
- → A Qualitative Approach for Assessing Receptivity to Federal Housing Initiatives: The Focus Group Technique(1995)2 cited
- → An Analysis of Medicare Payment Policy for Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Value of Patient Severity of Illness and Surgical Complexity as Predictors of Relative Resource Use in Total Joint Arthroplasty(2008)