Improving big citizen science data: Moving beyond haphazard sampling
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2019 papers
Abstract
Citizen science is mainstream: millions of people contribute data to a growing array of citizen science projects annually, forming massive datasets that will drive research for years to come. Many citizen science projects implement a "leaderboard" framework, ranking the contributions based on number of records or species, encouraging further participation. But is every data point equally "valuable?" Citizen scientists collect data with distinct spatial and temporal biases, leading to unfortunate gaps and redundancies, which create statistical and informational problems for downstream analyses. Up to this point, the haphazard structure of the data has been seen as an unfortunate but unchangeable aspect of citizen science data. However, we argue here that this issue can actually be addressed: we provide a very simple, tractable framework that could be adapted by broadscale citizen science projects to allow citizen scientists to optimize the marginal value of their efforts, increasing the overall collective knowledge.
Related Papers
- → Where Is the Mainstream of Music in the Late Twentieth Century?(1996)1 cited
- The establishment of the mainstream values of youg people in China(2008)
- On Reconstructing National Mainstream Spirit by Relying on Confucianism(2003)
- Trends of the social values since the beginning of Chinese reforms(2009)
- “Mainstream” TVs:be marginalized or not?(2007)