Safety of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Background Due to rapidly rising health care costs, leveraging outpatient surgery to reduce hospital inpatient burden is being explored. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with pooled analysis to determine its safety and feasibility. Methods Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), CINAHL (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched on 8 April 2024 for articles mentioning the following search concepts: (1) ambulatory; (2) outpatient; and (3) ALIF surgery. Included studies had (1) patients undergoing outpatient ALIF; (2) an inpatient control group; (3) a sample size of ≥5 in each cohort; and (4) a population aged ≥18 years. Outcome data were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria, and Newcastle-Ottawa scores were assigned to included studies lacking a prospective, randomized design. Fixed and random effects models were used to establish ORs and mean difference with 95% CIs for each outcome. Results Pooled analysis included results from 4 studies. A total of 2070 patients underwent outpatient ALIF and 12,554 underwent inpatient ALIF. The results showed that compared with inpatient ALIF, outpatient ALIF resulted in a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events (OR −0.89, 95% CI [−1.69, –0.09], I2 = 54.88%, P = 0.03), comparable readmission rates (OR 0.02, 95% CI [−0.16, 0.20], I2 = 0%, P = 0.816), and nearly statistically significant decrease in reoperation rates (OR −0.41, 95% CI [−0.83, –0.00], I2 = 0%, P = 0.05). Discussion These meta-analyses suggest that outpatient ALIF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events without a significant difference in hospital readmission or reoperation rates. These results suggest that in carefully selected patients, outpatient ALIF is safe and feasible. This study is limited by pooled analysis of retrospective data. Clinical Relevance This systematic review contributes to the assessment of the safety of outpatient ALIF spine surgery. Level of Evidence 3.

Related Papers

• MiR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.(2015)
• → Nurses’ use of computer databases to identify evidence for practice —a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey in a UK hospital(2001)51 cited
• → Network Meta-Analysis of the Antihypertensive Effect of Traditional Chinese Exercises on Patients with Essential Hypertension(2022)6 cited
• → Cost sharing and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions(2014)9 cited
• → Effect of Foot Care Education for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review(2023)