Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses
Canadian Medical Association Journal2020Vol. 192(32), pp. E901–E906
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2020 papers
Stefan Schandelmaier, Matthias Briel, Ravi Varadhan, Christopher H. Schmid, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Rodney A. Hayward, Joel Gagnier, Michael Borenstein, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden, Issa J Dahabreh, Xin Sun, Willi Sauerbrei, Michael Walsh, John P. A. Ioannidis, Lehana Thabane, Gordon H. Guyatt
Abstract
The Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses offers explicit guidance for investigators, systematic reviewers, journal editors and others considering making a claim of effect modification or interpreting a claim made by others.
Related Papers
- → Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies(2022)19 cited
- → On the Credibility of Employment in Graduates(2010)
- Absence of Credibility for College Students(2007)
- The Analysis of Economics on Lack of Credibility(2006)
- Credibility Education of College Students and Construction of Harmonious Soceity(2007)