The Scorn of Status: A Bias Toward Perceiving Anger on High-Status Faces

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2012 papers

Abstract

The expression of anger is an important signal of both danger and threat to social relationships. Furthermore, anger expressed by high-status people should be especially apparent due to the fact that high-status people may be perceived as more able to act on their intentions than low-status people. In the current research, we test the hypothesis that a perceiver will be biased toward anger appearing on the face of a high-status compared to a low-status face. Using an emotion detection task across two experiments, our findings revealed that White participants perceived anger to persist longer (Study 1) and appear sooner (Study 2) on the faces of high-status compared to low-status targets. This suggests that social context, in general, and social status (as indicated by occupation), in particular, can influence the perception of anger.

Related Papers

• → The Social Costs and Benefits of Anger as a Function of Gender and Relationship Context(2011)91 cited
• → Gender and Emotion Regulation: A Social Appraisal Perspective on Anger(2010)17 cited
• → Explaining Individual Differences in Third-Person Perception(2001)31 cited
• → Seeing Goal-Directedness: A Case for Social Perception(2018)5 cited
• → Measuring human social perception directly(1983)1 cited