Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review
PEDIATRICS2017Vol. 139(3)
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers
Shanil Ebrahim, Kelsey A. Vercammen, Arunima Sivanand, Gordon Guyatt, Alonso Carrasco‐Labra, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Mark W. Crawford, Gihad Nesrallah, Bradley C. Johnston
Abstract
Our study found 28 PROs that have been developed for children, with fewer than half providing credible estimates. Clinicians, clinical trialists, systematic reviewers, and guideline developers seeking to effectively summarize and interpret results of studies addressing PROs in child health are likely to find our comprehensive compendium of MIDs of use, both in providing best estimates of MIDs and identifying credible estimates.
Related Papers
- → Outcome effect, controllability and performance evaluation of managers: some field evidence from multi-outlet businesses(2000)72 cited
- → Effect of Intention on Outcome Bias in Decision Making—Implications for Safety Management(2015)3 cited
- Learning to Signal in Markets(1994)
- LEARNING TO SIGNAL IN MARKETS 1(1994)
- Evaluation of Follow-up Impact of the Honoured Outcome under the Quasi-Purchase System of Research Outcome(2008)