Selectively Answering Ambiguous Questions
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2023 papers
Abstract
Trustworthy language models should abstain from answering questions when they do not know the answer. However, the answer to a question can be unknown for a variety of reasons. Prior research has focused on the case in which the question is clear and the answer is unambiguous but possibly unknown. However, the answer to a question can also be unclear due to uncertainty of the questioner’s intent or context. We investigate question answering from this perspective, focusing on answering a subset of questions with a high degree of accuracy, from a set of questions in which many are inherently ambiguous. In this setting, we find that the most reliable approach to calibration involves quantifying repetition within a set of sampled model outputs, rather than the model’s likelihood or self-verification as used in prior work. We find this to be the case across different types of uncertainty, varying model scales and both with or without instruction tuning. Our results suggest that sampling-based confidence scores help calibrate answers to relatively unambiguous questions, with more dramatic improvements on ambiguous questions.
Related Papers
- Overview of Question-Answering(2002)
- → Repetition(1997)9 cited
- → Recall it again, Sam. Practices of Repetition in the Security Council(2017)7 cited
- A Survey on Question and Answering Systems(2012)
- → Repetitions of a text: A text on repetition(2018)