Is Consumption Insufficiently Sensitive to Innovations in Income

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 1987 papers

Abstract

Deaton (1986) has noted that if income is a first-order autoregressive process in first differences, then a simple version of Friedman’s permanent income hypothesis (SPIH) implies that measured U.S. consumption is insufficiently sensitive to innovations in income. This paper argues that this implication of the SPIH is a consequence of the fact that it ignores the role of the substitution effect in the consumption decision. Using a parametric version of the standard model of economic growth, the paper shows that very small movements in interest rates are sufficient to induce an empirically plausible amount of consumption smoothing. Since an overall evaluation of the model’s explanation for the observed smoothness of consumption requires examining its implications for other aspects of the data, the paper also explores some of these.

Related Papers

• → The Relative Permanent Income Theory of Consumption: A Synthetic Keynes–Duesenberry–Friedman Model(2009)87 cited
• → The Relative Income Theory of Consumption: A Synthetic Keynes-Duesenberry-Friedman Model(2022)29 cited
• Nigeria Consumption Function – An Empirical Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis(2017)
• Friedman′s Consumption Function and Permanent Income(1999)
• Consumption function under the permanent income hypothesis in selected Arab countries(2013)