Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low and intermediate risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score matching observational studies
Journal of Thoracic Disease2019Vol. 11(5), pp. 1945–1962
Citations Over TimeTop 11% of 2019 papers
Jintao Fu, Mohammad Sharif Popal, Yulin Li, Li GuoQi, Yue Qi, Fang Fang, Joey S.W. Kwong, Bin You, Xu Meng, Jie Du
Abstract
PROSPERO CRD 42018112626.
Related Papers
- → 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial(2015)1,720 cited
- → Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age(2012)164 cited
- → Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Vs Surgical Replacement of Failing Stented Aortic Biological Valves(2019)60 cited
- → Direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of perioperative mortality after sutureless or rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation(2016)12 cited
- → The Role of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Feasibility Analysis(2022)3 cited