Older Adults’ Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis
JMIR mhealth and uhealth2021Vol. 9(6), pp. e23832–e23832
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2021 papers
Kevin Moore, Emma O’Shea, Lorna Kenny, John Barton, Salvatore Tedesco, Marco Sica, Colum Crowe, Antti Alamäki, Joan Condell, Anna Nordström, Suzanne Timmons
Abstract
The added value of a wearable device is the resulting balance of motivators (or lack thereof), device features (and their accuracy), ease of use, device purpose, and user experience. The added value contributes to the successful integration of the device into the daily life of the user. Useful device features alone do not lead to continued use. A support structure should be placed around the user to foster motivation, encourage peer engagement, and adapt to the user's preferences.
Related Papers
- → Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review(2009)275 cited
- → An integrative review of supportive relationships between child‐bearing women and midwives(2022)35 cited
- → Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A comparison of search strategies(2017)23 cited
- → A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of search filters for qualitative research in PsycINFO and CINAHL(2020)12 cited
- Age and quality of life of family caregivers of individuals with dementia living at home: Systematic literature review(2014)