Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review
JMIR Mental Health2021Vol. 8(12), pp. e34170–e34170
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2021 papers
Julian Schwarz, Annika Bärkås, Charlotte Blease, Lorna Collins, Maria Hägglund, Sarah Markham, Stefan Hochwarter
Abstract
PAEHRs in MHC may strengthen user involvement, patients' autonomy, and shift medical treatment to a coproduced process. Acceptance issues among health care professionals align with the findings from general health settings. However, the corpus of evidence on digital sharing of EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions is limited. Above all, further research is needed to examine the clinical effectiveness, efficiency, and implementation of this sociotechnical intervention.
Related Papers
- Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research(2006)
- → Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri‐implant diseases with two methodological tools(2018)24 cited
- → [Introduction to PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist systematic reviews on complex interventions].(2019)6 cited
- [The practice of systematic reviews. I. Introduction].(1999)
- Bias within systematic and non-systematic literature reviews: the case of the Balanced Scorecard(2017)