Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review
JMIR Mental Health2023Vol. 10, pp. e42045–e42045
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2023 papers
Roberto Tornero-Costa, Antonio Martínez-Millana, Natasha Azzopardi‐Muscat, Ledia Lazëri, Vicente Traver, David Novillo-Ortiz
Abstract
These significant shortcomings, alongside the lack of information to ensure reproducibility and transparency, are indicative of the challenges that AI in mental health needs to face before contributing to a solid base for knowledge generation and for being a support tool in mental health management.
Related Papers
- → Rapid maxillary expansion and its consequences on the nasal and oropharyngeal anatomy and breathing function of children and adolescents: An umbrella review(2023)13 cited
- → Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal(2022)3 cited
- → Factors associated with occupational asthma among food industry workers: A systematic review(2023)7 cited
- → Determinants of seat belt use behaviour: a protocol for a systematic review(2018)10 cited
- → Outcomes of patient education in adult oncologic patients receiving oral anticancer agents: a systematic review protocol(2023)