Desperately Seeking Intersectionality in Digital Health Disparity Research: Narrative Review to Inform a Richer Theorization of Multiple Disadvantage
Journal of Medical Internet Research2022Vol. 24(12), pp. e42358–e42358
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2022 papers
Abstract
A limitation of our initial sample was the sparse and undertheorized nature of the primary literature. The lack of attention to how digital health disparities emerge and play out both within and across categories of disadvantage means that solutions proposed to date may be oversimplistic and insufficient. Theories of multiple disadvantage have bearing on digital health, and there may be others of relevance besides those discussed in this paper. We call for greater interdisciplinary dialogue between theoretical research on multiple disadvantage and empirical studies on digital health disparities.
Related Papers
- → Bringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: A systematic review(2010)117 cited
- → Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A comparison of search strategies(2017)23 cited
- → Understanding help-seeking decisions in people with subjective cognitive decline: A systematic review of qualitative studies(2021)12 cited
- → Cultural Cues: Review of Qualitative Evidence of Patient-Centered Care in Patients with Nonmalignant Chronic Pain(2011)16 cited
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)