Culture Contact Studies: Redefining the Relationship between Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1995 papers
Abstract
Archaeology is poised to play a pivotal role in the reconfiguration of historical anthropology. Archaeology provides not only a temporal baseline that spans both prehistory and history, but the means to study the material remains of ethnic laborers in pluralistic colonial communities who are poorly represented in written accounts. Taken together, archaeology is ideally suited for examining the multicultural roots of modern América. But before archaeology’s full potential to contribute to culture contact studies can be realized, we must address several systemic problems resulting from the separation of “prehistoric” and “historical” archaeology into distinct subfields. In this paper, I examine the implications of increasing temporal/regional specialization in archaeology on (1) the use of historical documents in archaeological research, (2) the study of long-term culture change, and (3) the implementation of pan-regional comparative analyses.
Related Papers
- → The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology(2006)71 cited
- → Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’(2019)48 cited
- Doing Archaeology: A Subject Guide for Students(2012)
- → Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology new directions in archaeology(1992)