The Test of Truth: An Experimental Investigation of the Norm of Assertion

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2020 papers

Abstract

Assertion is fundamental to our lives as social and cognitive beings. Philosophers have recently built an impressive case that the norm of assertion is factive. That is, you should make an assertion only if it is true. Thus far the case for a factive norm of assertion been based on observational data. This paper adds experimental evidence in favor of a factive norm from six studies. In these studies, an assertion’s truth value dramatically affects whether people think it should be made. Whereas nearly everyone agreed that a true assertion supported by good evidence should be made, most people judged that a false assertion supported by good evidence should not be made. The studies also suggest that people are consciously aware of criteria that guide their evaluation of assertions. Evidence is also presented that some intuitive support for a non-factive norm of assertion comes from a surprising tendency people have to misdescribe cases of blameless rule-breaking as cases where no rule is broken.

Related Papers

• → Being in a Position to Know is the Norm of Assertion(2020)42 cited
• → Belief, assertion and Moore’s Paradox(2007)25 cited
• → Testimony and the Constitutive Norm of Assertion(2015)22 cited
• → There is No (Sui Generis) Norm of Assertion(2020)2 cited
• → Three Arguments against Constitutive Norm Accounts of Assertion(2022)