Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2022 papers
Abstract
Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of thirteen classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, ten effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects – flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification – did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or U.S. versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
Related Papers
- → High Replicability of Newly-Discovered Social-behavioral Findings is Achievable(2020)55 cited
- → The effect of shape properties on ad-hoc shape replication with mouse, pen, and touch input(2012)11 cited
- → No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications(2020)10 cited
- → Replicate, Replicate, Replicate(2011)7 cited
- The Optimal Replication Strategy under the Initial Wealth Which can't Replicate the Given Contingent Claim(2006)