The Bayesian New Statistics (Public)

Citations Over Time

Abstract

In the practice of data analysis, there is a conceptual distinction between hypothesis testing, on the one hand, and estimation with quantified uncertainty, on the other hand. Among frequentists in psychology a shift of emphasis from hypothesis testing to estimation has been dubbed "the New Statistics" (Cumming, 2014). A second conceptual distinction is between frequentist methods and Bayesian methods. Our main goal in this article is to explain how Bayesian methods achieve the goals of the New Statistics better than frequentist methods. The article reviews frequentist and Bayesian approaches to hypothesis testing and to estimation with confidence or credible intervals. The article also describes Bayesian approaches to meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, and power analysis.

Related Papers

• → Bayeswatch: an overview of Bayesian statistics(2002)30 cited
• → Speaking on Data’s Behalf: What Researchers Say and How Audiences Choose(2019)4 cited
• → Bayesiant-tests for correlations and partial correlations(2019)1 cited
• → Bayesian Evidence Synthesis for the common effect model(2021)3 cited
• → Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide for Urologists and Clinicians(2022)