Refined Preference-based Argumentation Frameworks

Citations Over TimeTop 12% of 2010 papers

Abstract

Argumentation is a reasoning model based on constructing arguments, determining potential conflicts between arguments and determining acceptable arguments. Dung's argumentation theory is an abstract framework based on a binary defeat relation between arguments. Due to this abstract representation, it has been instantiated in different ways. In particular, preference-based argumentation frameworks take into account a preference relation over arguments together with a (non necessarily symmetric) attack relation. We show that preference-based argumentation frameworks faithfully instantiate Dung's framework only when the attack relation is symmetric. Moreover the latter condition prevents undesirable results. We also promote a higher impact of preferences in preference-based argumentation frameworks and propose different ways to rank-order sets of acceptable arguments.

Related Papers

• → The argumentation in Galatians(2010)2 cited
• Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
• → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)
• → Feminisms and Argumentation(2016)
• → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)