Automated Assessment of Quality of Jupyter Notebooks Using Artificial Intelligence and Big Code

Citations Over Time

Abstract

We present in this paper an automated method to assess the quality of Jupyter notebooks. The quality of notebooks is assessed in terms of reproducibility and executability. Specifically, we automatically extract a number of expert-defined features for each notebook, perform a feature selection step, and then trained supervised binary classifiers to predict whether a notebook is reproducible and executable, respectively. We also experimented with semantic code embeddings to capture the notebooks' semantics. We have evaluated these methods on a dataset of 306,539 notebooks and achieved an F1 score of 0.87 for reproducibility and 0.96 for executability (using expert-defined features) and an F1 score of 0.81 for reproducibility and 0.78 for executability (using code embeddings). Our results suggest that semantic code embeddings can be used to determine with good performance the reproducibility and executability of Jupyter notebooks, and since they can be automatically derived, they have the advantage of no need for expert involvement to define features.

Related Papers

• → Short- and long-term reproducibility of radioisotopic examination of gastric emptying(1990)20 cited
• → Reasoning with executable specifications(1995)14 cited
• The Direct Execution of SPECS-C++: A Model-Based Specification Language for C++ Classes(1994)
• The reproducibility of reported height and body weight in repeated questionnaire surveys.(1995)
• The reproducibility of scores from three video formats.(1988)