Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of managing long-term oral anticoagulation therapy: a systematic review and economic modelling
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2007 papers
Abstract
For selected and successfully trained patients, self-monitoring is effective and safe for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. In general, patient self-management (PSM) is unlikely to be more cost-effective than the current specialised anticoagulation clinics in the UK; self-monitoring may enhance the quality of life for some patients who are frequently away from home, who are in employment or education, or those who find it difficult to travel to clinics. Further research is needed into alternative dosing regimes, the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of patient education and training in long-term oral anticoagulation therapy, UK-relevant cost-effectiveness, the effectiveness of PSM in children, and the potential future developments of near-patient testing devices.
Related Papers
- → Interventions for ADHD in childhood and adolescence: A systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis(2023)21 cited
- → Meta-Meta-analysis(2017)19 cited
- A further increase of late age-related macular degeneration until 2050 in Europe – a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression(2019)
- → Review for "Dropout and adherence of obstructive sleep apnea patients to mandibular advancement device therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta‐analysis and meta‐regression"(2021)
- → Age and Liver Graft: A Meta-analysis and Metaregression Analysis(2023)