A Numerical Comparison of the Sensitivity of the Geometric Mean Method, Eigenvalue Method, and Best–Worst Method

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Abstract

In this paper, we compare three methods for deriving a priority vector in the theoretical framework of pairwise comparisons—the Geometric Mean Method (GMM), Eigenvalue Method (EVM) and Best–Worst Method (BWM)—with respect to two features: sensitivity and order violation. As the research method, we apply One-Factor-At-a-Time (OFAT) sensitivity analysis via Monte Carlo simulations; the number of compared objects ranges from 3 to 8, and the comparison scale coincides with Saaty’s fundamental scale from 1 to 9 with reciprocals. Our findings suggest that the BWM is, on average, significantly more sensitive statistically (and thus less robust) and more susceptible to order violation than the GMM and EVM for every examined matrix (vector) size, even after adjustment for the different numbers of pairwise comparisons required by each method. On the other hand, differences in sensitivity and order violation between the GMM and EMM were found to be mostly statistically insignificant.

Related Papers

• → Super Pairwise Comparison Matrix in the Multiple Dominant AHP with Hierarchical Criteria(2018)6 cited
• → Incomplete Large-Dimensional Pairwise Comparison Matrices(2018)2 cited
• → Non-pairwise Collaborative Filtering(2023)2 cited
• → The validity of pairwise models in predicting community dynamics(2016)3 cited
• → Pairwise Comparisons Simplified(2013)