Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Fetal Echocardiography: Application to Heart Standard View Segmentation for Congenital Heart Defects Detection

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of fetal heart in echocardiography images is essential for detecting the structural abnormalities such as congenital heart defects (CHDs). Due to the wide variations attributed to different factors, such as maternal obesity, abdominal scars, amniotic fluid volume, and great vessel connections, this process is still a challenging problem. CHDs detection with expertise in general are substandard; the accuracy of measurements remains highly dependent on humans' training, skills, and experience. To make such a process automatic, this study proposes deep learning-based computer-aided fetal heart echocardiography examinations with an instance segmentation approach, which inherently segments the four standard heart views and detects the defect simultaneously. We conducted several experiments with 1149 fetal heart images for predicting 24 objects, including four shapes of fetal heart standard views, 17 objects of heart-chambers in each view, and three cases of congenital heart defect. The result showed that the proposed model performed satisfactory performance for standard views segmentation, with a 79.97% intersection over union and 89.70% Dice coefficient similarity. It also performed well in the CHDs detection, with mean average precision around 98.30% for intra-patient variation and 82.42% for inter-patient variation. We believe that automatic segmentation and detection techniques could make an important contribution toward improving congenital heart disease diagnosis rates.

Related Papers

• → Two-stage ultrasound image segmentation using U-Net and test time augmentation(2020)101 cited
• → Analysis of segmentation of lung parenchyma based on deep learning methods(2021)32 cited
• → Exploring the Effectiveness of Multi-Objective Training for Organ Substructure Segmentation in Medical Imaging(2023)4 cited
• → New discrepancy measures for segmentation evaluation(2004)21 cited
• → Comparative Evaluation Of Three Methods Of Automatic Segmentation Of Brain Structures Using 426 Cases(2020)