Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2023 papers

Abstract

Discussions around transparency in open science focus primarily on sharing data, materials, and coding schemes, especially as these practices relate to reproducibility. This fairly quantitative perspective of transparency does not align with all scientific methodologies. Indeed, qualitative researchers also care deeply about how knowledge is produced, what factors influence the research process, and how to share this information. Explicating a researcher’s background and role allows researchers to consider their impact on the research process and interpretation of the data, thereby increasing both transparency and rigor. Researchers may engage in positionality and reflexivity in a variety of ways, and transparently sharing these steps allows readers to draw their own informed conclusions about the results and study as a whole. Imposing a limited, quantitatively-informed set of standards on all research can cause harm to researchers and the communities they work with if researchers are not careful in considering the impact of such standards. Our paper will argue the importance of avoiding strong defaults around transparency (e.g., always share data) and build upon previous work around qualitative open science. We explore how transparency in all aspects of our research can lend itself toward projecting and confirming the rigor of our work.

Related Papers

• → Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity(1998)618 cited
• → Reflexivity:promoting rigour in qualitative research(2009)387 cited
• → Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research(2014)294 cited
• → Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research(2009)220 cited
• → Institutional and national policy implications for adopting open access, open data and open science strategies – South Africa(2016)