On believing and hoping whether
Semantics and Pragmatics2021Vol. 14(6), pp. 1–21
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2021 papers
Abstract
Theories of clause selection that aim to explain the distribution of interrogative and declarative complement clauses often take as a starting point that predicates like think, believe, hope, and fear are incompatible with interrogative complements. After discussing experimental evidence against the generalizations on which these theories rest, I give corpus evidence that even the core data are faulty: think, believe, hope, and fear are in fact compatible with interrogative complements, suggesting that any theory predicting that they should not be must be jettisoned. EARLY ACCESS
Related Papers
- → The contrast between interrogatives and questions(1994)185 cited
- → Interrogative–Indefinite Puzzle(2007)2 cited
- → The Interrogative in a Syntactic Framework(1978)9 cited
- The Study of Interrogative Sentences in Lao Ch’i-ta(2013)
- → Polar Interrogative Strategies in Obolo(2022)