Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Related Papers
- → What Yelp Fake Review Filter Might Be Doing?(2021)550 cited
- → Towards a General Rule for Identifying Deceptive Opinion Spam(2014)362 cited
- → Exploiting Burstiness in Reviews for Review Spammer Detection(2021)350 cited
- Negative Deceptive Opinion Spam(2013)
- → Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews(2021)217 cited