How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
arXiv (Cornell University)2016
Citations Over Time
Abstract
We investigate evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation systems where supervised labels, such as task completion, are not available. Recent works in response generation have adopted metrics from machine translation to compare a model's generated response to a single target response. We show that these metrics correlate very weakly with human judgements in the non-technical Twitter domain, and not at all in the technical Ubuntu domain. We provide quantitative and qualitative results highlighting specific weaknesses in existing metrics, and provide recommendations for future development of better automatic evaluation metrics for dialogue systems.
Related Papers
- → Strengths and weaknesses of NESTs and NNESTs: Perceptions of NNESTs in Hong Kong(2011)87 cited
- → Stats Aren’t Everything: Learning Strengths and Weaknesses of Cricket Players(2020)1 cited
- → Forget your weaknesses(2009)
- → Weaknesses and Strengths(2019)
- → An International Collaboration Strategy Based on the Scientific Strengths and Weaknesses in Security Domain(2022)