Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmas
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Groups of humans are often able to find ways to cooperate with one another in complex, temporally extended social dilemmas. Models based on behavioral economics are only able to explain this phenomenon for unrealistic stateless matrix games. Recently, multi-agent reinforcement learning has been applied to generalize social dilemma problems to temporally and spatially extended Markov games. However, this has not yet generated an agent that learns to cooperate in social dilemmas as humans do. A key insight is that many, but not all, human individuals have inequity averse social preferences. This promotes a particular resolution of the matrix game social dilemma wherein inequity-averse individuals are personally pro-social and punish defectors. Here we extend this idea to Markov games and show that it promotes cooperation in several types of sequential social dilemma, via a profitable interaction with policy learnability. In particular, we find that inequity aversion improves temporal credit assignment for the important class of intertemporal social dilemmas. These results help explain how large-scale cooperation may emerge and persist.
Related Papers
- → Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas(2017)164 cited
- Inequity aversion resolves intertemporal social dilemmas(2018)
- → Social Influence as Intrinsic Motivation for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning(2018)262 cited