Detecting Overfitting via Adversarial Examples
Citations Over Time
Abstract
The repeated community-wide reuse of test sets in popular benchmark problems raises doubts about the credibility of reported test-error rates. Verifying whether a learned model is overfitted to a test set is challenging as independent test sets drawn from the same data distribution are usually unavailable, while other test sets may introduce a distribution shift. We propose a new hypothesis test that uses only the original test data to detect overfitting. It utilizes a new unbiased error estimate that is based on adversarial examples generated from the test data and importance weighting. Overfitting is detected if this error estimate is sufficiently different from the original test error rate. We develop a specialized variant of our test for multiclass image classification, and apply it to testing overfitting of recent models to the popular ImageNet benchmark. Our method correctly indicates overfitting of the trained model to the training set, but is not able to detect any overfitting to the test set, in line with other recent work on this topic.
Related Papers
- → Lazy Overfitting Control(2013)10 cited
- Sparse data and the effect of overfitting avoidance in decision tree induction(1992)
- Measuring Generalization and Overfitting in Machine Learning(2019)
- → Marginalizing Corrupted Features(2014)4 cited
- A new measure for overfitting and its implications for backdooring of deep learning.(2020)