Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Recent years have seen a dramatic expansion of tasks and datasets posed as question answering, from reading comprehension, semantic role labeling, and even machine translation, to image and video understanding. With this expansion, there are many differing views on the utility and definition of "question answering" itself. Some argue that its scope should be narrow, or broad, or that it is overused in datasets today. In this opinion piece, we argue that question answering should be considered a format which is sometimes useful for studying particular phenomena, not a phenomenon or task in itself. We discuss when a task is correctly described as question answering, and when a task is usefully posed as question answering, instead of using some other format.
Related Papers
- → (2019)31,533 cited
- → HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case(2019)17,204 cited
- → SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text(2016)6,222 cited
- → The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering(2018)339 cited
- Advanced techniques for personalized, interactive question answering(2007)