Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Miscalibration - a mismatch between a model's confidence and its correctness - of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) makes their predictions hard to rely on. Ideally, we want networks to be accurate, calibrated and confident. We show that, as opposed to the standard cross-entropy loss, focal loss [Lin et. al., 2017] allows us to learn models that are already very well calibrated. When combined with temperature scaling, whilst preserving accuracy, it yields state-of-the-art calibrated models. We provide a thorough analysis of the factors causing miscalibration, and use the insights we glean from this to justify the empirically excellent performance of focal loss. To facilitate the use of focal loss in practice, we also provide a principled approach to automatically select the hyperparameter involved in the loss function. We perform extensive experiments on a variety of computer vision and NLP datasets, and with a wide variety of network architectures, and show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art calibration without compromising on accuracy in almost all cases. Code is available at https://github.com/torrvision/focal_calibration.
Related Papers
- → Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition(2016)216,943 cited
- Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods(1999)
- On calibration of modern neural networks(2017)
- → Obtaining Well Calibrated Probabilities Using Bayesian Binning(2015)912 cited
- Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naive Bayesian classifiers(2001)