0 references
Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation
arXiv (Cornell University)2020
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various extension-based semantics. Given a framework with which explanations for argumentation-based conclusions can be derived, we study necessity and sufficiency: what (sets of) arguments are necessary or sufficient for the (non-)acceptance of an argument?
Related Papers
- → On Computing Explanations in Argumentation(2015)77 cited
- → On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments(2015)24 cited
- → Necessary and Sufficient Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions(2021)7 cited
- → Block Argumentation(2019)5 cited
- → Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions(2022)4 cited