Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Accurate estimation of predictive uncertainty (model calibration) is essential for the safe application of neural networks. Many instances of miscalibration in modern neural networks have been reported, suggesting a trend that newer, more accurate models produce poorly calibrated predictions. Here, we revisit this question for recent state-of-the-art image classification models. We systematically relate model calibration and accuracy, and find that the most recent models, notably those not using convolutions, are among the best calibrated. Trends observed in prior model generations, such as decay of calibration with distribution shift or model size, are less pronounced in recent architectures. We also show that model size and amount of pretraining do not fully explain these differences, suggesting that architecture is a major determinant of calibration properties.

Related Papers

• → Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images(2024)25,445 cited
• → Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning(2024)4,551 cited
• → A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks(2016)1,615 cited
• → Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure(2018)401 cited