Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers

Citations Over Time

Abstract

In theorem proving, the task of selecting useful premises from a large library to unlock the proof of a given conjecture is crucially important. This presents a challenge for all theorem provers, especially the ones based on language models, due to their relative inability to reason over huge volumes of premises in text form. This paper introduces Thor, a framework integrating language models and automated theorem provers to overcome this difficulty. In Thor, a class of methods called hammers that leverage the power of automated theorem provers are used for premise selection, while all other tasks are designated to language models. Thor increases a language model's success rate on the PISA dataset from $39\%$ to $57\%$, while solving $8.2\%$ of problems neither language models nor automated theorem provers are able to solve on their own. Furthermore, with a significantly smaller computational budget, Thor can achieve a success rate on the MiniF2F dataset that is on par with the best existing methods. Thor can be instantiated for the majority of popular interactive theorem provers via a straightforward protocol we provide.

Related Papers

• → Capitalizing on Language Learners' Individuality: From Premise to Practice(2014)80 cited
• → PENALARAN DEDUKTIF SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BERDASARKAN PERBEDAAN GENDER(2017)5 cited
• → The default‐interventionist model underlies premise typicality weakening the premise diversity effect during category‐based induction: Event‐related potentials evidence(2022)1 cited
• "Common sense" and the logical premise to Chinalized Maxism(2008)
• → Arguments(2014)