Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictions

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models. But what exactly in the training data causes a model to make a certain prediction? We seek to answer this question by providing a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework. Importantly, our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone. Addressing the problem of extracting factual knowledge from pretrained language models (PLMs), we focus on simple data statistics such as co-occurrence counts and show that these statistics do influence the predictions of PLMs, suggesting that such models rely on shallow heuristics. Our causal framework and our results demonstrate the importance of studying datasets and the benefits of causality for understanding NLP models.

Related Papers

• → Non-causal versus causal qualitative modelling and simulation(1993)5 cited
• ADD – heuristics' starting procedures for capacitated plant location models(1985)
• → Observational Causal Studies(2020)
• → The Framework(2011)