ML Interpretability: Simple Isn't Easy

Citations Over Time

Abstract

The interpretability of ML models is important, but it is not clear what it amounts to. So far, most philosophers have discussed the lack of interpretability of black-box models such as neural networks, and methods such as explainable AI that aim to make these models more transparent. The goal of this paper is to clarify the nature of interpretability by focussing on the other end of the 'interpretability spectrum'. The reasons why some models, linear models and decision trees, are highly interpretable will be examined, and also how more general models, MARS and GAM, retain some degree of interpretability. I find that while there is heterogeneity in how we gain interpretability, what interpretability is in particular cases can be explicated in a clear manner.

Related Papers

• → Innovative approaches to addressing the tradeoff between interpretability and accuracy in ship fuel consumption prediction(2023)56 cited
• → Demystifying Black Box Models with Neural Networks for Accuracy and Interpretability of Supervised Learning(2018)1 cited
• → Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences(2016)549 cited
• → A Theory of Diagnostic Interpretation in Supervised Classification(2018)1 cited